person writing at desk

Eight important questions for your
After The Event insurance provider

Published: 04 December 2023
The impact is felt by many, but none more so than the claimant themselves. So, solicitors need to ensure they’re partnering with providers who will protect their clients throughout their legal action – no matter how long it takes.
Even if a law firm changed ATE providers every year, they’d still be required to work with old providers for several years. So, when deciding who to work with, it’s important to consider more than just “price”. It’s no good having a cheap product if the provider is insolvent when a claim is made. It’ll also be tricky justifying to the client (and maybe the regulator) why the selected product isn’t suitable. 
Due diligence is essential for law firms, so we’ve put together a list of questions to help:
We’re currently seeing the impact of inflation and the pressure it’s putting on insurers. But solicitors need to be confident that their chosen provider will be there when they’re needed. Financial health checks are one thing, but also ask about how much business they’ve written in the last 3 years, and their future plans in your sector of business.
The provider a law firm chooses to partner with isn’t always the business responsible for paying claims. That’s because not all ATE providers are insurers. So, it’s important to get a clear understanding of who’s responsible and establish whether they have a suitable solvency ratio to meet their obligations, which can sometimes be three or four years after the policy was taken out.
Some providers offer a top-up facility if the initial ATE cover has reached its indemnity limit. But some don’t. It’s important to understand this, otherwise you could be scrambling to find another ATE provider when a case is about to go to trial.
This could be providing funds or working seamlessly alongside a medical agency to provide a solution. Like many businesses in this financial climate, law firms are feeling the pressure. So, a suitable solution which assists with cashflow could set an ATE provider apart. Consider all options carefully without compromising on the ATE product for the sake of additional funding.
There should be clear operating instructions that outline how you’ll work together. This should cover what permissions the provider is prepared to give to place cases on cover, provide case updates, make claims and any referral triggers. Solutions should be simple. 
You’ll be recommending the ATE products to your client, so you need to have trust and confidence that your ATE provider is equal to your own standards.
It’s important to understand what’s expected in terms of case selection and case outcomes, but also for ATE providers to share data with you. Having key performance indicators agreed in advance by both parties will provide a positive structure for future account reviews and allow for early intervention and resolution should challenges arise.
This is the true acid test of how adaptable an ATE provider is and whether they’re truly working in partnership with you. It always helps to have a dedicated account handler for your firm and to meet with them before any contract is signed. Ask for examples of how the partnership will work in practice and how they approach solving difficult problems.